Exercise 3.11
During the discussion in class, Rohan gives a statement that, “A tissue is a group of similar cells performing similar functions”. But Rajiv counter argues that, “this is true in case of simple tissues but little different in case of complex tissues”. Provide your explanation in view of the discussion in class.
Not cross-checked
NCERT prints no numerical answer for this exercise, so this working has not been cross-checked against the book.
Both are partly right, and Rajiv's correction is the one that matters: Rohan's definition fits simple tissues but breaks down for complex tissues.
Rohan is quoting the chapter's general definition correctly — a tissue is a group of cells, similar in structure, that work together to perform a specific function.
It holds for simple permanent tissues. Parenchyma, collenchyma and sclerenchyma are each made of only one type of cell, which is exactly what "simple" means in the chapter.
It holds for meristematic tissue too, and for animal tissues like muscle and epithelium.
It fails for complex permanent tissues, which the chapter defines as being made up of more than one type of cell working together.
Xylem contains tracheids, vessels, xylem parenchyma and xylem fibres — dead and living cells, tubular and fibrous, side by side. Tracheids and vessels are thick-walled tubes; the parenchyma is the only living component; the fibres are sclerenchymatous. Structurally they are not alike at all, yet all of them serve one job: conducting water and minerals, and giving strength.
Phloem contains sieve tubes, companion cells, phloem parenchyma and phloem fibres. Sieve tubes carry the food, companion cells regulate loading and unloading of sugars, parenchyma stores food, resin, tannins and latex, and fibres give strength. Four different cell types, one shared purpose.
So the accurate statement is: a tissue is a group of cells — similar or dissimilar in structure — that work together to perform a specific function.
It is the shared function, not identical structure, that makes a group of cells a tissue. Rohan has described the usual case; Rajiv has spotted the exception that forces the better definition.